Proposed traffic alterations in Coventry’s Earlsdon district have stirred discussion, with more than 50 objections lodged against the suggested measures. These changes, part of a wider initiative dubbed as a “liveable neighbourhood” scheme, have come under scrutiny, particularly regarding the proposed implementation of a 20mph speed limit across over 40 roads.
Following approval of these changes in January, the Coventry City Council now confronts the task of addressing objections raised by concerned residents. A spokesperson for the council confirmed the reception of 55 objections from 31 individuals, with only one specifically targeting the proposed 20mph speed restrictions.
These objections will be formally deliberated upon at a meeting chaired by a cabinet member responsible for city services. As per the council’s website, the meeting will determine whether to approve, reject, or amend the proposed traffic regulation orders (TROs). Notably, any significant modifications to the orders would necessitate a fresh round of advertising.
The proposed measures encompass various initiatives, including the installation of raised tables at three locations within the suburb, establishment of two controlled crossings, enforcement of new waiting restrictions, and imposition of restrictions barring vehicles, except cycles, from entering specific roads at two junctions. Furthermore, the council intends to re-evaluate its policy on 20mph speed limit areas in the city next year, with a focus on identifying priority zones for future implementations.
A spokesperson for Coventry City Council elucidated, “The 20mph zone is one of several changes forming part of the Earlsdon Liveable Neighbourhood scheme. A total of 55 objections were received from 31 individuals across the entire scheme.” They further clarified that many objections pertained to alterations in yellow lines, point closures, or pedestrian crossings, rather than solely focusing on the proposed speed limits.
The decision-making process concerning these objections is scheduled for April, with a report set to be presented to the cabinet member for consideration. Regarding future 20mph zones, the council highlighted its ongoing policy review, emphasising consultation with local residents and case-specific evaluations to determine new zone locations.
A council representative expressed support for the proposed measures, asserting that slowing down traffic would enhance safety in Earlsdon. They underscored the potential benefits for vulnerable road users, particularly around Earlsdon Primary School, where pedestrian traffic is frequent during peak hours.
“We believe that Earlsdon is an area that will benefit from creating an environment where traffic moves more slowly, creating safer streets designed around people rather than traffic,” remarked the spokesperson. “Reducing the impact of traffic will help to increase walking and cycling levels in the area.”
The proposed traffic changes in Earlsdon underscore a broader trend towards prioritising pedestrian safety and encouraging sustainable modes of transport. As Coventry navigates through these objections, the outcome of the forthcoming decision in April will undoubtedly shape the future landscape of transportation policies within the city and potentially influence similar initiatives nationwide.
