Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

Is it cheating? AI use during job interviews sparks debate over whether to restrict emerging tools

Share This Post

The AI Hiring Conundrum: Balancing Innovation and Authenticity in the Job Search

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed industries, including the way we approach job seeking and hiring. As AI tools become more advanced, they are increasingly being used to assist in resume building, interview preparation, and even coding tests. However, this growing trend has sparked a heated debate: Should AI be allowed to help candidates land jobs, or does it give them an unfair advantage? This dilemma is particularly evident in the tech industry, where companies are grappling with the implications of AI usage during the hiring process.

Amazon’s Stance on AI in Hiring: A Delicate Balance

One of the most prominent examples of this debate is Amazon’s recent crackdown on the use of AI tools during job interviews. According to a report by Business Insider, Amazon has issued guidelines that could disqualify candidates found using AI tools like generative AI or coding assistants during interviews. This comes as a challenge for Amazon, given that the company is a major player in the development and promotion of AI technology. The question arises: How can a tech giant that encourages the use of AI in numerous applications draw the line when it comes to hiring?

The tension is evident. On one hand, AI is integrated into many aspects of the job search process, from resume-building tools to interview prep platforms. On the other hand, the use of AI during actual interviews raises concerns about authenticity and fairness. For instance, Jeff Spector, co-founder of Karat, a company that conducts technical interviews for tech firms, revealed that many candidates are using AI tools like Large Language Models (LLMs) for coding tests, despite explicit instructions against it. This has led some companies to take drastic measures, such as Wendy Hellar’s client who took down remote roles because every interview involved candidates using AI for technical coding sections.

The Great Divide: Companies Weigh In on AI Usage

Not all companies are against the use of AI in hiring. Some industry leaders argue that embracing AI is the future, and they want to hire candidates who are skilled in leveraging these tools. Greg Gottesman, co-founder of Pioneer Square Labs, believes that candidates who are "obsessed with new AI tools" are exactly the ones he wants to hire. "I want people who are looking to radically enhance their skills using AI," he said. For Gottesman, the key is to assess how well candidates can use AI as a tool, rather than relying on it as a crutch.

Similarly, T.A. McCann, Managing Director at Pioneer Square Labs, echoed this sentiment. He believes that the best candidates are those who "lean into" new technologies like AI. McCann also points out that if a candidate tries to fake their way through an interview using AI, it will eventually become apparent. "And what’s the point of faking it?" he asks. This perspective suggests that companies value authenticity and the ability to use AI as a tool, rather than a substitute for real skills.

Navigating the Gray Area: Compromise and Adaptation

For companies that fall somewhere in the middle, the solution lies in evolving the hiring process to reflect the changing landscape. Jeff Spector of Karat believes that interviews should assess the competencies required for the job, rather than focusing on whether a candidate used AI. As AI becomes more integral to roles like software development, Spector argues that the interview process should focus on underlying skills like problem-solving, systems thinking, and handling edge cases. Companies are starting to ask for a measure of a candidate’s proficiency in using AI, rather than simply banning it.

However, for many hiring managers, there’s still a strong emphasis on authenticity. Wendy Hellar, a veteran in staffing and talent management, explains that engineering leaders want to know if a candidate can perform the work without AI support. They are looking for candidates with strong foundational skills, as well as a genuine understanding of the role. "A lot of companies, especially startups, are really looking for authentic voices," she said. "They want to know who you are as a person. Those small teams that work together so closely do not want to hire a robot."

The Practical Impact of AI on Job Seekers

For job seekers, the stakes are high. While companies like Tesla and Google have largely embraced AI as a tool for hiring, others, like Amazon, are stricter about its use. Nick Dimitrov, a former Amazon "Bar Raiser" and founder of Amazon Bound, advises job seekers to use AI where possible, particularly in technical and coding tests. "Candidates would be foolish not to use AI help," he said. "And using AI help on these tests doesn’t mean you’re cheating – Amazon understands that, and some Amazon teams increasingly devise their Online Assessment questions knowing that people use AI."

However, there are limits to how AI can be used effectively. Dimitrov warns that using AI to answer open-ended interview questions often results in stilted, overly academic responses that lack specificity. This is a red flag for hiring managers. "This is a big no-no that would get you instantly ‘no-hired,’" he said. Instead, he advocates for using AI as a resource to prepare and refine answers, rather than relying on it during live interviews. Job seekers must learn to strike a balance between leveraging AI as a tool and showcasing their authentic skills and personality.

The Future of AI in Hiring: Opportunities and Challenges

As the debate continues, one thing is clear: AI is here to stay, and its role in hiring will evolve over time. Whether AI usage becomes a standard skill or remains a red flag will depend on the company and the specific role. For now, companies are experimenting with different approaches, from banning AI outright to actively seeking candidates who are proficient in its use.

Ultimately, the key is to find a balance between innovation and authenticity. Companies need to adapt their hiring processes to reflect the reality that AI is a part of the modern workplace, while ensuring that candidates are assessed fairly and transparently. For job seekers, the challenge is to embrace AI as a tool without losing sight of the qualities that make them unique and valuable. As the tech industry continues to grapple with this issue, one thing is certain: The hiring process will never be the same again.

Related Posts