A business in Ickleton has been refused permission to permanently retain three large tipi tents for hosting events at Riverside Barns. The decision by South Cambridgeshire District Council follows concerns about the impact and sustainability of the events operation, alongside issues related to environmental and planning regulations.
Riverside Barns, situated on Frogge Street, is managed by a development company that acquired the site in 2022. Since then, the company has undertaken extensive efforts to refurbish the property, which had suffered from years of neglect. As part of this rejuvenation, three canvas tipi tents, each reaching 7.4 metres in height, were erected to provide sheltered spaces for various activities including picnics and private events.
The business argued that the tents had been beneficial in supporting local independent shops and a café located on the site. They contended that the tents offered much-needed cover during bad weather and enabled the hosting of private events such as weddings and wakes. The company believed that the tents were permissible under temporary structure regulations that typically do not require formal planning approval, assuming they were dismantled between uses.
However, the district council’s planning department raised objections, stating that the scale of the events facilitated by the tents would represent a substantial increase in activity, which they deemed unsustainable for the site’s location. The site’s classification as a countryside area further complicated the matter, with the council expressing concerns that the permanent presence of the tents would lead to an “intensification of development” that clashes with the rural setting.
In their refusal, the planning officers highlighted several issues. They noted a lack of detailed information regarding the types of events planned and their potential impact on the local community. The absence of a noise impact assessment, which would address potential disturbances to nearby residents, was particularly noted. Additionally, the flood risk assessment provided was deemed insufficient, failing to demonstrate that the tents would not increase flood risks in the surrounding area.
The local parish council also raised objections, expressing fears that the site could become predominantly an event venue, which might undermine its intended function and alter the character of the location. They described the plan as an “intensification of development” incompatible with its countryside setting.
While acknowledging the positive impact the tents have had on the local economy, the planning officers concluded that these benefits did not outweigh the potential adverse effects of their permanent installation. This decision reflects a broader regulatory approach aimed at balancing economic growth with environmental and community considerations.
The management of Riverside Barns has expressed disappointment with the decision but has not yet outlined their subsequent actions. It remains uncertain whether they will appeal the decision or seek alternative methods to comply with planning regulations.
This situation highlights the ongoing challenges faced by businesses attempting to innovate and expand within the constraints of planning regulations. It underscores the need for thorough planning and environmental assessments, and the importance of aligning business activities with both community and regulatory expectations.
In summary, the refusal to grant permission for the permanent installation of the tipi tents at Riverside Barns demonstrates the regulatory scrutiny that accompanies new developments. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between fostering economic development and preserving the integrity of rural and residential areas. The future of Riverside Barns will be observed as a key example of navigating the intersection between business objectives and planning constraints.
