Residents in the Crownhill district of Plymouth are once again expressing discontent as plans resurface to develop the sole green area within a vast housing estate. The proposed construction of five affordable homes on this council-owned plot, spearheaded by developer Darren Wills of Classic Builders (SW) Ltd, has reignited a nearly three-year-long battle between residents and developers.
Initial plans were withdrawn in 2021 following widespread protests, but now, with a scaled-down proposal, the developer aims to address residents’ concerns. However, the Crownhill Local Area Residents Association (CLARA) remains disheartened, expressing fears of losing vital green space and the impact on wildlife.
According to documents submitted to the Plymouth City Council, the new plan incorporates feedback from residents and includes the creation of a community garden. Despite this concession, CLARA, the driving force behind the “save our green” campaign, remains steadfast in its opposition.
A spokesperson for CLARA lamented the potential loss of community green space, stressing its importance in fostering community well-being. They highlighted concerns regarding children’s safety, noting that the absence of local green areas would force youngsters to navigate busy roads in search of alternative play spaces.
Furthermore, CLARA expressed apprehension about the loss of mature trees and its implications for local wildlife, including foxes, hedgehogs, bats, birds, and butterflies. The spokesperson underscored the role of green spaces in mitigating isolation among vulnerable groups and enhancing community cohesion.
While acknowledging the need for affordable housing, CLARA questioned the necessity of developing the last remaining green space in the area, particularly in light of other ongoing development projects nearby. They emphasised the significance of preserving green spaces for the benefit of all residents, particularly children, the disabled, and the elderly.
CLARA has urged residents to voice their opinions to the council before the end of April, encouraging specificity in responses and referencing relevant planning regulations. They underscored the importance of community engagement in shaping local development decisions.
The proposed development comprises two flats and three houses arranged in a staggered terrace, a departure from the previous plan for seven homes. In a statement accompanying the planning application, the developer emphasised the project’s aim to provide affordable housing in a sustainable manner.
The statement outlined the proposed housing mix, including one-bedroom flats, three-bedroom houses, and a two-bedroom house, each with its own back garden. It also addressed concerns about tree loss, citing disease and proposing structured planting to maintain habitat viability.
As the deadline for public feedback approaches, the fate of Wilmot Gardens hangs in the balance. While the need for affordable housing is undeniable, the community’s attachment to its green spaces is equally strong. The outcome of this debate will not only shape the landscape of Crownhill but also reflect broader tensions between development and conservation in urban areas.
In conclusion, the clash over Wilmot Gardens underscores the delicate balance between urban development and environmental preservation. As Plymouth grapples with growing housing demands, it faces crucial decisions regarding the protection of green spaces essential for community well-being. The resolution of this dispute will undoubtedly leave a lasting impact on the fabric of the local community and its relationship with its natural surroundings.
